The hate for the joo joo (formerly the Crunchpad) has been palpable,
From Silicon Alley Insider,
At $500, this Web-only tablet is very expensive. And it doesn’t do much — just a Web device.
You can get a far better device for far less money. Who does Fusion Garage think it is, Apple? the price alone, makes this device a FAIL. Forget that it’s from a name you’ve never heard of. Forget that it’s Linux. Forget that it’s a really cut down Linux distro that’s totally hooked to the web. Forget that chances are not a single machine will ever see light of day because it’ll become a casualty of litigation.
it’s priced out of reach of most consumers, and functionally doesn’t offer much more than a $300 Netbook, although arguably it performs many of the same functions with a lot more style.
(Though it seems more recent, hands-on reviews of the tablet have been a lot more favorable)
Call me an optimist, but I think the joo joo has a lot going for it, and many of the negative comments directed towards it seem to be based on the fact that it will be competing against similarly priced netbooks, and that’s only a valid comparison if you think netbooks (or laptops for that matter) are comparable devices; in my view, they’re not, tablets are a new form of computing devices, one poised to become more powerful and user-friendly than the netbook/laptop form. My primary reason for this view, user input.
A while back I noticed something, I do very little typing when browsing the web, the majority of the time I’m reading, browsing, or scanning a page’s content or scrolling; when I do type, it’s typically in short bursts – long emails and blog posts are not frequent activities for me. I suspect the same behavior is true to a certain extent for others as well. Given this behavior, the mouse can be viewed as the primary input device, with the keyboard being secondary. Of course on a laptop or netbook you don’t have a mouse, but a touchpad, which is, in my opinion, a terrible input device. The touchpad tries to replicate the functionality of the mouse, but never really hits the mark; it does not provide the same level of fine-grained precision, it’s not as comfortable, and it feels fairly awkward to use. The nipple is only slightly better, and has the added disadvantage of bruising your index finger after extended usage. This is why I’m optimist for the joo joo, and tablets in general, it provides a form-factor and input device that eliminates the horrid touchpad, and provides a computer with a form of user input that matches or, in some cases, rival the mouse.
The joojoo is not a netbook or a laptop, and it shouldn’t try to be one. As for some of the other criticisms,
- When did everyone become an expert on pricing?! $500 is steep, but not necessarily for early adopters. New graphics cards and CPUs can hit or exceed the $500 mark (note, that’s $500 for a single component, where there is typically no software out that can push it to the limit). The iPhone debuted at $600, and that was before the app store.
- I don’t like that it’s a web-only device, but it seems to be a necessity here, as there isn’t a real hard drive, which makes sense; a conventional hard drive would kill a tablet (too heavy, too bulky, too much power consumption) as would an SSD (too expensive).
- There is no problem with this device running Linux. Linux is a very capable operating system.
- I have no comment on the litigation issue, I have no knowledge of what the relationship was between Arrington and Fusion Garage (and I doubt anyone else does either, beyond the parties involved). I was under the impression that Arrington was founder of the company making the device, that was obviously not the case.